My TV producers asked our Facebook audience to vote for a topic they'd most like
to hear discussed on my year-end show. The overwhelming winner, for some reason:
the education standards program Common Core.
Most Americans don't even know what that is. But they should. It's the
government's plan to try to bring "the same standard" to every government-run
school.
This may sound good. Often, states dumb down tests to try to "leave no child
behind." How can government evaluate teachers and reward successful schools if
there isn't a single national standard?
But when the federal government imposes a single teaching plan on 15,000
school districts across the country, that's even more central planning, and
central planning rarely works. It brings stagnation.
Education is a discovery process like any other human endeavor. We might be
wrong about both how to teach and what to teach, but we won't realize it unless
we can experiment -- compare and contrast the results of different approaches.
Having "one plan" makes it harder to experiment and figure out what works.
Some people are terrified to hear "education" and "experiment" in the same
sentence. Why take a risk with something as important as my child's education?
Pick the best education methods and teach everyone that way!
But we don't know what the best way to educate kids is.
As American education has become more centralized, the rest of our lives have
become increasingly diverse and tailored to individual needs. Every minute,
thousands of entrepreneurs struggle to improve their products. Quality
increases, and costs often drop.
But centrally planned K-12 education doesn't improve. Per-student spending
has tripled (governments now routinely spend $300,000 per classroom!), but test
results are stagnant.
"Everyone who has children knows that they're all different, right? They
learn differently," observed Sabrina Schaeffer of the Independent Women's Forum
on my show. "In the workplace, we're allowing people flexibility to telecommute,
to have shared jobs. In entertainment, people buy and watch what they want, when
they want." Having one inflexible model for education "is so old-fashioned."
No Child Left Behind programs were an understandable reaction to atrocious
literacy and graduation rates -- but since school funding was pegged to
students' performance on federally approved tests, classroom instruction became
largely about drilling for those tests and getting the right answers, even if
kids did little to develop broader reasoning skills. So along comes Common Core
to attempt to fix the problem -- and create new ones.
Common Core de-emphasizes correct answers by awarding kids points for
reasoning, even when they don't quite get there.
A video went viral online that showed a worried mom, Karen Lamoreaux -- a
member of the group Arkansas Against Common Core -- complaining to the Arkansas
Board of Education about complicatedly worded math problems meant for
fourth-graders. She read to the Board this question: "Mr. Yamato's class has 18
students. If the class counts around by a number and ends with 90, what number
did they count by?"
Huh?
But I could be wrong. Maybe this is a clever new way to teach math, and maybe
Lamoreaux worries too much. Unfortunately, though, if Lamoreaux is right, and
the federal government is wrong, government still gets to decree its universal
solution to this problem.
Promoters of Common Core say, "Don't worry, Common Core is voluntary." This
is technically true, but states that reject it lose big federal money. That's
Big Government's version of "voluntary."
Common Core, like public school, public housing, the U.S. Postal Service, the
Transportation Security Administration, etc., are all one-size-fits-all
government monopolies. For consumers, this is not a good thing.
With the future riding on young people consuming better forms of education,
I'd rather leave parents and children (and educators) multiple choices.
Despite Common Core, Schaeffer pointed out that this year did bring some
victories for educational freedom. "We saw new education tax credit programs and
expansion of tax credit programs in numerous states -- Alabama, Indiana, Iowa
and others. Education Savings Accounts expanded in other states; voucher
programs expanded."
This is good news. Vouchers, Education Savings Accounts and tax credits
create competition and choice.
Obama is no kings don’t like to be constrained. But all government should be.Obama is Pathological Liar, He is an Ideological Liar because the true objectives of his fundamental transformation of the United States are incompatible with American democracy and tradition Obama devotion to the Machiavellian dictum of "the ends justify the means" and lying as an instrument of government policy have been the tools of political extremists throughout history.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Recent presidential tradition includes leaving a handwritten letter in the Oval Office for the next man who takes the o...
No comments:
Post a Comment