More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi
scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media
Monday afternoon.
These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are
currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully
protected by the Whistleblower law.
According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will
be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the
scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that
are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
The former diplomats inform PJM the new revelations concentrate in
two areas — what Ambassador Chris Stevens was actually doing in Benghazi
and the pressure put on General Carter Ham, then in command of U.S.
Africa Command (AFRICOM) and therefore responsible for Libya, not to act
to protect jeopardized U.S. personnel.
Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger
missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department,
not by the CIA. Such a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the
intelligence agency had opposed the idea because of the high risk
involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger
civilian aircraft.
Hillary Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of
the diplomats said, she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”
This left Stevens in the position of having to clean up the
scandalous enterprise when it became clear that the “insurgents”
actually were al-Qaeda – indeed, in the view of one of the diplomats,
the same group that attacked the consulate and ended up killing Stevens.
The former diplomat who spoke with PJ Media regarded the whole
enterprise as totally amateurish and likened it to the Mike Nichols film
Charlie Wilson’s War about a clueless congressman who supplies
Stingers to the Afghan guerrillas. “It’s as if Hillary and the others
just watched that movie and said ‘Hey, let’s do that!’” the diplomat
said.
He added that he and his colleagues think the leaking of General
David Petraeus’ affair with his biographer Paula Broadwell was timed to
silence the former CIA chief on these matters.
Regarding General Ham, military contacts of the diplomats tell them
that AFRICOM had Special Ops “assets in place that could have come to
the aid of the Benghazi consulate immediately (not in six hours).”
Ham was told by the White House not to send the aid to the trapped
men, but Ham decided to disobey and did so anyway, whereupon the White
House “called his deputy and had the deputy threaten to relieve Ham of
his command.”
The White House motivation in all this is as yet unclear, but it is
known that Ham retired quietly in April 2013 as head of AFRICOM.
PJ Media recognizes this is largely hearsay, but the two diplomats
sounded quite credible. One of them was in a position of responsibility
in a dangerous area of Iraq in 2004.
We will report more as we learn it.
http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2013/05/21/pjm-exclusive-ex-diplomats-report-new-benghazi-whistleblowers-with-info-devastating-to-clinton-and-obama/?singlepage=true
Obama is no kings don’t like to be constrained. But all government should be.Obama is Pathological Liar, He is an Ideological Liar because the true objectives of his fundamental transformation of the United States are incompatible with American democracy and tradition Obama devotion to the Machiavellian dictum of "the ends justify the means" and lying as an instrument of government policy have been the tools of political extremists throughout history.
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Recent presidential tradition includes leaving a handwritten letter in the Oval Office for the next man who takes the o...
No comments:
Post a Comment