Wednesday, April 26, 2017

Racist Obama Caused Dems' Downfall, Not Hillary!







Related imageT

he press is starting to pile on Hillary Clinton for losing to President Trump, but the real cause of the Democrats' defeat is never discussed.  It is Obama himself.

According to Gallup, averaging his two terms, Obama was the most unpopular President since President Truman, save only for Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford.  Even Nixon was more popular.  That poll will never be reported in the liberal press.  But Democrats can’t ignore this astounding precinct map, that shows how tiny the blue islands have become in a sea of red voters.

Obama thinks Democrats should continue to write off those red voters.  They don’t have long to wait for the demographics of immigration to turn America's majority non-white.  Obama is unfazed because he dreams about this: we already have a non-white majority among Americans under age 5.  Obama foresees a permanent Democratic government, based on minority immigration rates, coupled with ginning up racial and gender divisiveness. 

Trump won the Democrat heartland?  A short-term setback.  Soon progressives can tell the heartland to get lost.  As Obama told David Remnick, he ‘believes in demographics.’
The hyper-partisan media will never criticize Obama.  This week, the DNC’s number two guy, Keith Ellison, broke the rules and shocked everyone by blaming Saint Barack Obama for the party’s diminished, sorry self. 
“Given we lost a lot of statehouse seats, governorships, secretary of states… he can’t say that he wasn’t part of those losses. Who else, right?”

Ellison understated the problem.  There are fewer Democrats in Congress than since 1929, fewer Democrats in state and federal offices than since the Civil War.  Democrats can beat up on Hillary Clinton all they want. It has nothing to do with Hillary’s campaign and everything to do with Obama’s radical agenda as President. Hillary is just the biggest Democrat politician of them all who followed Obama’s polarizing priorities right off the cliff. 
Mainstream America wanted jobs and racial healing, secure borders and safety from jihad.  Obama gave them the opposite.  Once elected, he went further and repeatedly dissed his white voters as bigots.  Obama’s radical millennial shock troops, financed and trained during his eight years in office, now pipe the tune to which the Democrats dance.  (See my columns, Obama’s Snowflakes and Obama Fundamentally Transformed America the Democrats.) 

Americans have had enough progressive politics to see they don’t like it. Voter flight from Democrats started with Obamacare and the corrupt stimulus.  They were losing their jobs by the millions.  It doesn’t get worse than that.  Except it did get worse, as Americans began to lose their lives to jihadis and cop killers and illegal criminal aliens.  If you didn’t like it, you were called a racist and Islamophobe.  Progressives boasted that whites would soon be a minority in America.  People could see the exploding Hispanic and Muslim population in their towns and cities, brought into this country for the good of the Democrat Party, not for America’s good.  The culture war Obama launched against religious freedom was the coup de grace

During Obama’s two terms, ordinary Republicans and independents turned to Tea Party conservatives, at every level of government.  They wanted leaders to fight Obama’s re-do of America, and go-along Republicans.  Trump was the first fighter they had a chance to vote for in a Presidential race, and the crowds flocked to him.   

Hillary’s failure is supposedly that she ignored the white working class.  The entire Democrat party thought that calling Trump supporters names was the way to go – they still do. 

Since her loss, the DNC and the Democratic leadership have doubled down.  They are still not talking about jobs or national security or the immigration problem.  They’re too busy screaming that Trump is a Russian stooge, based on fake leaks apparently orchestrated by our exiting President.  They’re still yelling that businessman Donald Trump and his working class voters are white nationalists.  They’re blaming Hillary, because her identity politics flopped, all the while continuing it themselves. 

Obama’s polices didn’t even work well for Obama, as the Gallup Poll shows, but they served the purpose of his radical takeover of the party.  Eight years is a long time.  Obama abused federal funding and threats of lawsuits to yank campus culture hard left.  He forced the black community left by purposely inflaming racial grievances in Florida and Ferguson, Missouri, and from there across the country.  It was Obama who awarded the Marxist Black Lives Matter power and legitimacy. Hillary was stuck with them.  Obama even promoted pro-jihadi Islamists to positions of power and influence. 

As president, Obama started a private foundation, which he calls Organizing for Action, which trained 30,000 millennial street activists, as many as half from immigrant families.  He funneled his campaign experts and donors to this left-wing army, leaving normal liberal politicians on their own.  Most of them went down to defeat, but Obama never changed course.   He was not interested in building the Democrat Party, but in taking it over. 

Thanks to Obama’s community organizing from the White House, America now has a hardcore, violent, progressive vanguard, which the useful idiot Democratic Party leaders and media are applauding as “the Resistance.”   This is Obama’s lasting legacy.

With the help of a partisan, unethical press, the Democrats normalized Obama’s every aberrant trait.  But Obama is aberrant.  He is a Democrat in name only – in reality, he is a hard left “red diaper baby” – as were Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod.  Obama has had literally lifelong radical ties, starting with his grandfather and mother, as well as his Kenyan father, and Obama’s beloved teenage mentor, child molester Frank Marshall Davis, a member of the Communist Party.  (According to Paul Kengor, Frank Davis’s political work for the Soviets got him placed on the FBI’s Security Index, so he could be immediately arrested in a national emergency – the Cold War equivalent of our terrorist watchlist.)

In college Obama tells us, he only associated with radicals.  After law school, he moved to Chicago and began radical left “community” organizing.  He entered politics as the chosen successor to a socialist state senator.
Out of sight of the public, President Obama’s actions continued those of the professional agitator he was in Chicago.  He funneled half a billion dollars in federal fines to leftist groups, using a “a shakedown system eerily reminiscent of the ACORN “Muscle for Money” program that he was a part of in Chicago.”  On campuses, he forced colleges to hire radical blacks and feminist thought police and start a rape witch-hunt against white men, using the threat of civil rights suits and loss of federal funds. 

After his re-election, Obama flirted with what he called going “Bulworth” – that is, revealing that he is a socialist.  How galling for him Sanders’ acclaim by millennials must be, but Sanders is a loser.  By hiding his Marxism, Obama made it to the White House, twice.

Ominously, Obama says he will devote his post-presidency to funding, training and organizing more activists.  That is not normal.  Presidents in America retire from politics.  They have since George Washington.  It is crucial to our democracy.  

Happily, the rest of us are not stuck in Obama’s scenario.  America is not as racist as he is.  We have a unified vision of success for the whole country, based on our common American values. A renewal of freedom and personal responsibility has the potential to unleash enormous prosperity for every American citizen.
If Trump succeeds in doubling and tripling the GDP growth rate, easily within his grasp with sensible pro-growth policies and reining in the administrative state, he can blow Obama’s race-based strategy to bits.  Trump has sworn he will be the greatest job creator the world has ever seen – not just for white Americans, for all Americans.  If he succeeds in bringing jobs to our unemployed white working class, minorities and millennials, it will be a game changer.

Racial demographics need not be destiny.  We are all Americans and want the best for each other.  America is better than Obama’s dark radical vision of us. 

What a wonderful thought:  Democrats will play the race card, and no one will listen.

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Dems Demand Legal Justification for Syria Strike? Where, The Liberal Demand Legal Justification For Obama MARCH 21, 2011 Libyan air defenses and government forces.


 Image result for Obama bombing Libya


Two top Democrats are demanding President Trump provide legal justification for his decision to launch 59 tomahawk missiles on a Syrian airfield earlier this month - the base believed to be the source of a deadly chemical attack. Evidence points to the Assad regime.

Most of Congress - even Democrats - appeared to support the strike. Yet, Democratic leadership wanted Trump to seek an Authorization of the Use of Military Force before taking any further military actions. Now, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), who served as Hillary Clinton's vice
presidential running mate, and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), have sent a letter to Trump on Monday seeking an explanation for the airstrike.
"It has now been over two weeks since you ordered the strike on the airfield, and your Administration has yet to put forward any detailed legal analysis or justification for that action under domestic and international law," the Democrats wrote.

"The legal justification for an attack on the Syrian government is not an afterthought, but rather a first order consideration, and something that is vital for the American people to understand at the outset," they added.
The majority of Americans approved of the president's decisive action - perhaps because they witnessed years of inaction and empty threats from the Obama administration.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2017/04/25/dems-demand-legal-justification-for-syria-strike-n2318129

Other One Of Obama And Hillary Abortion Facility SHUT DOWN": Louisiana abortion facility that killed 7,482 babies closes for good

Image result for Obama And Hillary Mad
BOSSIER CITY, Louisiana, April 24, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) -- Pro-life intercessors have claimed a victory with the closing of a Louisiana abortion business.

40 Days for Life has sponsored prayer vigils outside the Bossier City Medical Suite and now local leader Chris Davis says the abortion mill has ceased operations.

“After five years of standing in prayer outside the Bossier abortion facility, God has answered those prayers in a big way!” Davis declared. “Thanks to 40 Days for Life … and all the local volunteers who have an untold number of hours on the sidewalk!”

Documents obtained by Louisiana Right to Life reveal that the facility's operators returned their medical license to the state Department of Health.

The document also states that Dr. James Degueurce, who apparently was the abortionist there, "intends to continue providing abortion care to Louisiana women at a clinic yet to be determined."
“With the closure of Bossier City Medical Suite, there is one less facility in Louisiana destroying the lives of innocent unborn babies,” Louisiana Right to Life Executive Director Benjamin Clapper said.
Republican Congressman Mike Johnson of the 4th District issued a statement calling the closure a "wonderful development." "I believe we have a moral obligation and duty to defend the most defenseless among us and to stand up for innocent unborn children."

Clapper reflected on the many lives the abortion business cut short. "From 2006 to 2015, this facility sold 7,482 abortions," he said. "We mourn for these lives that will never enjoy life in Louisiana, but we rejoice that this facility will no longer be in the business of abortion."

The closure brings the number of abortion businesses in the state to three. Those include Women’s Health Care Center in New Orleans, Delta Clinic in Baton Rouge, and Hope Medical Group for Women in Shreveport.

The closure of Bossier City Medical Suite is not expected to slow down the local abortion industry. The Shreveport abortion business is only six minutes away.

Early last year, the Bossier City clinic stopped doing abortions for a brief time because of a pro-life law protecting women's health by requiring local hospital privileges. Clinic owners petitioned for and received a "stay" of enforcement of the pro-life law.

40 Days for Life lists 85 similar closures and attributes the trend to the power of peaceful prayer.
“We encourage the pro-life community to continue its efforts to provide help to mothers and babies, both before and after birth. We look forward to a day when all babies are protected by law and welcomed with joy,” Clapper said.

Davis confirmed the closure with a picture of a moving truck outside the clinic as the staff packed the business into boxes.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/shut-down-louisiana-abortion-facility-that-killed-7482-babies-closes-for-go

Obama Planned Parenthood Bracing For nationwide pro-life protests this weekend

KALAMAZOO, Michigan, April 25, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — With the National Day of Prayer and Protest against Planned Parenthood coming this weekend, the abortion giant is encouraging its supporters to remain calm.

 Related image



On Friday and Saturday, pro-lifers across the country will gather at local Planned Parenthood clinics to pray. #ProtestPP is sponsoring prayer vigils, marches, demonstrations, and rallies for life.
"We will call on our leaders in Washington to defund Planned Parenthood — the nation’s largest abortion provider — and redirect all their federal taxpayer funding to comprehensive health centers that are not involved in abortion," the ProtestPP website explains.

In the past, however, peaceful, praying pro-lifers were met with angry and sometimes violent counter-protesters. The pro-abortionists sought to disrupt pro-life prayers.

One example was caught on video February 11 in Detroit, where Planned Parenthood supporters became "obnoxious, vulgar, obscene and rude — indeed they acted like bullies toward those with whom they disagree," a video poster related. "Notice the 'F' word shouted out by abortion supporters in an attempt to drown out the pro-lifers peacefully praying."

In light of past incidents, at least one Planned Parenthood official is asking supporters not to counter-demonstrate.

Megan Zapinski, program manager for Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan, sent out a notice to supporters urging them to stay away.

"Planned Parenthood of Michigan has non-engagement and No Counter Protest Policies, especially as it pertains to demonstrations at our health centers," she wrote. "These demonstrations, whether in support of or opposition to Planned Parenthood, are disruptive to daily operations and intimidating for our patients."

One pro-life leader explained why Planned Parenthood would be afraid to encourage counter-protesting. “They let their real concern slip in a Cosmopolitan interview: 'All it takes one person to react to an "anti" and things can escalate very quickly.' They know that if (when) their supporters get violent, it will reflect badly on Planned Parenthood."

"I recommend having a designated person record video at every location," the pro-lifer concluded.
Zapinski's notice to supporters asked them to show support for abortion "in other ways than counter-protesting." She suggested an "action or rally" at a local Congressional office, asking questions at a member of Congress' event, gathering signatures in support of Planned Parenthood, writing to members of Congress, calling a radio talk show, writing a letter to the editor, and donating money to the ucrative abortion conglomerate.

To find a pro-life #ProtestPP in your area, click here.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/planned-parenthood-bracing-for-nationwide-pro-life-protests-this-weekend

Hawaii on verge of forcing pro-life pregnancy centers to advertise abortion? So Much For So It Show That Again Pro Choice IS Dead, Whhen The Left IS Forcing all Women To Support Abortion,, Now


 Image result for pro choice



All five pro-life pregnancy help organizations on the Hawaiian islands are the stroke of a pen away from being forced by law to advertise abortions, following a vote by Hawaii’s house of representatives a couple weeks ago in Honolulu.

With only 10 of Hawaii’s 51 state representatives voting against SB 510, the measure will now go back to the state senate for a review of amendments before landing on the desk of Democratic Gov. David Ige.

Backed by Planned Parenthood Northwest and Hawaii, the edict mirrors a 2015 California law that is likely on its way to the U.S. Supreme Court because, as pro-lifers argue, it forces them to choose between denying conscience by posting pro-abortion signage and defying the government by refusing to comply with the law.

If the law were to take effect, all community-funded pregnancy centers offering free services such as ultrasounds would be forced—at the threat of a $500 first-time fine and a $1,000 subsequent fine—to post and distribute to clients the following statement:
Hawaii has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services, including, but not limited to, all FDA-approved methods of contraception and pregnancy-related services for eligible women.
To apply online for medical insurance coverage, that will cover the full range of family planning and prenatal care services, go to mybenefits.hawaii.gov.

Only ultrasounds performed by qualified healthcare professionals and read by licensed clinicians should be considered medically accurate.
While supporters of the bill, including state Rep. Chris Lee, argued that its intent is to provide “basic transparency,” opponents to the law argued that it was not likely to pass constitutional muster on First Amendment grounds, and pointed out that the state should use its own resources to advertise its own taxpayer-funded programs.
One lawmaker, Reb. Bob McDermott, was far more direct in his criticism.
“Ultimately, what was the whole point of this whole thing? Where did it come from? Why is it even before us? It’s before us because there’s Christian centers that offer alternatives to abortion,” McDermott said. “They don’t believe in abortion. So, a woman comes in there and they’re encouraging, they offer alternatives but they don’t do abortions. And that’s what this is about.
“These pregnancy centers offer the ultrasound… the young lady will not have the abortion—she won’t—and Planned Parenthood loses money.”
Trampling on Free Speech
Arguing that the law is a threat to free speech, Hawaiian pro-lifers have seen their rights evaporate even while the bill has made its march through the state legislature.
Their testimony opposing the bill has been held back from relevant committees, an issue the state’s attorney general has said is a violation of First Amendment rights.
At issue in the censorship was testimony from a former client at one center, A Place for Women in Waipio—an outreach of Calvary Chapel Pearl Harbor—who now works with Planned Parenthood. The woman had testified to the senate’s Ways and Means Committee that her experience at the center had left her feeling like “the only thing they cared about was the baby.”
Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!
While that testimony—even if true—has nothing to do with the law, A Place For Women submitted rebuttal testimony citing a voluntary exit survey the same woman had filled out saying her visit was, "very comfortable." The senate president squelched the rebuttal testimony before it was passed onto committee members, however, denying A Place for Women a chance to plead its case.
That action, the attorney general asserted in a March 29 letter, infringed on the pregnancy help center’s First Amendment right to petition the government.

“The fact that we did not have a voice in that decision is very concerning,” Joy Wright, executive director at Malama Pregnancy Center, said. “Even if they’re for the bill, it’s very important that we have a voice. We are abiding by the process put together by the state legislature, and so if it’s not followed through on the other side, then we have a problem that needs to be addressed."

Legislation by Anecdote
Testifying in favor of the bill prior to the vote, Lee relayed an anecdotal example of a woman he claimed to know who went to a pregnancy center—though he didn’t specify which center, or if it was even in Hawaii—and wasn’t able to access the morning-after pill at the center.

Plan B One-Step, commonly called the morning-after pill, has been available for sale over the counter since 2013, and pregnancy centers do not refer for abortions or abortifacient drugs such as the morning-after pill.

At a hearing before the state’s House Committee on Health on March 16, one supporter of the bill, Michael Golojuch, Jr., chair of the state’s All five pro-life pregnancy help organizations on the Hawaiian islands are the stroke of a pen away from being forced by law to advertise abortions, following a vote by Hawaii’s house of representatives a couple weeks ago in Honolulu.
With only 10 of Hawaii’s 51 state representatives voting against SB 510, the measure will now go back to the state senate for a review of amendments before landing on the desk of Democratic Gov. David Ige.
Backed by Planned Parenthood Northwest and Hawaii, the edict mirrors a 2015 California law that is likely on its way to the U.S. Supreme Court because, as pro-lifers argue, it forces them to choose between denying conscience by posting pro-abortion signage and defying the government by refusing to comply with the law.
If the law were to take effect, all community-funded pregnancy centers offering free services such as ultrasounds would be forced—at the threat of a $500 first-time fine and a $1,000 subsequent fine—to post and distribute to clients the following statement:
Hawaii has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services, including, but not limited to, all FDA-approved methods of contraception and pregnancy-related services for eligible women.
To apply online for medical insurance coverage, that will cover the full range of family planning and prenatal care services, go to mybenefits.hawaii.gov.
Only ultrasounds performed by qualified healthcare professionals and read by licensed clinicians should be considered medically accurate.
While supporters of the bill, including state Rep. Chris Lee, argued that its intent is to provide “basic transparency,” opponents to the law argued that it was not likely to pass constitutional muster on First Amendment grounds, and pointed out that the state should use its own resources to advertise its own taxpayer-funded programs.
One lawmaker, Reb. Bob McDermott, was far more direct in his criticism.
“Ultimately, what was the whole point of this whole thing? Where did it come from? Why is it even before us? It’s before us because there’s Christian centers that offer alternatives to abortion,” McDermott said. “They don’t believe in abortion. So, a woman comes in there and they’re encouraging, they offer alternatives but they don’t do abortions. And that’s what this is about.
“These pregnancy centers offer the ultrasound… the young lady will not have the abortion—she won’t—and Planned Parenthood loses money.”
Trampling on Free Speech
Arguing that the law is a threat to free speech, Hawaiian pro-lifers have seen their rights evaporate even while the bill has made its march through the state legislature.
Their testimony opposing the bill has been held back from relevant committees, an issue the state’s attorney general has said is a violation of First Amendment rights.

At issue in the censorship was testimony from a former client at one center, A Place for Women in Waipio—an outreach of Calvary Chapel Pearl Harbor—who now works with Planned Parenthood. The woman had testified to the senate’s Ways and Means Committee that her experience at the center had left her feeling like “the only thing they cared about was the baby.”
Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!
While that testimony—even if true—has nothing to do with the law, A Place For Women submitted rebuttal testimony citing a voluntary exit survey the same woman had filled out saying her visit was, "very comfortable." The senate president squelched the rebuttal testimony before it was passed onto committee members, however, denying A Place for Women a chance to plead its case.
That action, the attorney general asserted in a March 29 letter, infringed on the pregnancy help center’s First Amendment right to petition the government.

“The fact that we did not have a voice in that decision is very concerning,” Joy Wright, executive director at Malama Pregnancy Center, said. “Even if they’re for the bill, it’s very important that we have a voice. We are abiding by the process put together by the state legislature, and so if it’s not followed through on the other side, then we have a problem that needs to be addressed."
Legislation by Anecdote

Testifying in favor of the bill prior to the vote, Lee relayed an anecdotal example of a woman he claimed to know who went to a pregnancy center—though he didn’t specify which center, or if it was even in Hawaii—and wasn’t able to access the morning-after pill at the center.

Plan B One-Step, commonly called the morning-after pill, has been available for sale over the counter since 2013, and pregnancy centers do not refer for abortions or abortifacient drugs such as the morning-after pill.

At a hearing before the state’s House Committee on Health on March 16, one supporter of the bill, Michael Golojuch, Jr., chair of the state’s LGBT Caucus, testified that pregnancy centers are dangerous for women based on his own third-hand account of the sister of one of his friends.

Without providing any substantiating details or even establishing that the pregnancy center had made a mistake of any kind, Golojuch’s testimony was markedly similar to the sweeping claims often made by abortion lobby groups and one “undercover reporter” whose vague allegations formed the backbone of California’s 2015 law.
“We don’t make policy based on anecdotal stories,” McDermott said. “The biggest thing that these centers do is—the ones that have it—provide an ultrasound opportunity for the young lady to see the child. Once the young lady sees the child, the abortion option is almost always off the table, because they see this living, breathing human being.”
Past attempts by local authorities to compel pro-life pregnancy centers to post signage either declaring the services they do not offer or referring patients—even indirectly—to abortion providers have been struck down in New York City, Austin (TX), Baltimore (MD) and Montgomery County (MD), the latter of which cost taxpayers $330,000 in attorneys fees.
Meanwhile, another law in Illinois forcing pro-life medical professionals to refer for abortions is facing similar challenges in court.
As one pro-abortion lawmaker, Joy San Buenaventura, said Tuesday, the potential redirecting of federal taxpayer dollars away from Planned Parenthood to federally qualified health centers makes cracking down on pregnancy help centers a must for the abortion industry.
“In this federal climate that we have here, where the defunding of Planned Parenthood seems to me highly likely, there’s going to be a number of consumers who’ll be flocking to these limited pregnancy centers,” Buenaventura said. “What we have produced here is… the best of all possible options.”
Reprinted with permission from Pregnancy Help News.
s, testified that pregnancy centers are dangerous for women based on his own third-hand account of the sister of one of his friends.

Without providing any substantiating details or even establishing that the pregnancy center had made a mistake of any kind, Golojuch’s testimony was markedly similar to the sweeping claims often made by abortion lobby groups and one “undercover reporter” whose vague allegations formed the 

backbone of California’s 2015 law.
“We don’t make policy based on anecdotal stories,” McDermott said. “The biggest thing that these centers do is—the ones that have it—provide an ultrasound opportunity for the young lady to see the child. Once the young lady sees the child, the abortion option is almost always off the table, because they see this living, breathing human being.”

Past attempts by local authorities to compel pro-life pregnancy centers to post signage either declaring the services they do not offer or referring patients—even indirectly—to abortion providers have been struck down in New York City, Austin (TX), Baltimore (MD) and Montgomery County (MD), the latter of which cost taxpayers $330,000 in attorneys fees.

Meanwhile, another law in Illinois forcing pro-life medical professionals to refer for abortions is facing similar challenges in court.

As one pro-abortion lawmaker, Joy San Buenaventura, said Tuesday, the potential redirecting of federal taxpayer dollars away from Planned Parenthood to federally qualified health centers makes cracking down on pregnancy help centers a must for the abortion industry.
“In this federal climate that we have here, where the defunding of Planned Parenthood seems to me highly likely, there’s going to be a number of consumers who’ll be flocking to these limited pregnancy centers,” Buenaventura said. “What we have produced here is… the best of all possible options.”
Reprinted with permission from Pregnancy Help News.

Monday, April 24, 2017

Obama Blames Gerrymandering, Special Interests, & Money in Politics for Not Getting A Lot Done

Related image

Obama Blames Gerrymandering, Special Interests, & Money in Politics for Not Getting A Lot Done

Image result for Obama blames head wind

Obama Blames Gerrymandering, Special Interests, & Money in Politics for Not Getting A Lot Done


 Image result for Obama blame bush


Obama was a likely cause behind the Democratic Party losing every branch of the U.S. government (and most state ones too). The fact that the media won't tell you is that Americans didn't actually appreciate his progressive policies. That's why they lost in such a spectacular way! But, rather than internalizing Americans' distrust in his first major post-presidency speech, Obama blamed gerrymandering, special interests, and money in politics. Oy gevalt! Turns out Obama is just as delusional out of office as he was in office.
https://pjmedia.com/video/obama-blames-gerrymandering-special-interests-money-in-politics-for-not-getting-a-lot-done/

Obama Prompts Laughter From Audience In fFrst Public Remarks Since Leaving Office, What BE Believe, IS What We Know, Obama Your A Liar, That What We Know,

Barack Obama, in his first public remarks since leaving office, drew laughter from an audience Monday when he said his previous comments that there were no red states or blue states were meant as an “aspirational comment.”

 Related image




Speaking before a group of students at the University of Chicago, Obama reflected on the current political divide in the country, acknowledging how many Americans are “listening to people who already agree with them and are further and further reinforcing their own realities to the neglect of a common reality.”

The former president recalled saying before he became president that there was no such thing as red states or blue states. But on Monday, Obama added that when he made that comment, he was speaking not realistically, but ideally.

“When I said in 2004 there were no red states or blue states. They are the United States of America, that was an aspirational comment,” Obama said.

That comment prompted laughter from the audience. But Obama doubled down.
“But I think it’s — and it’s one by the way that I still believe in the sense that when you talk to individuals one on one, there’s a lot more that people have in common that divides them,” Obama said. “But obviously, it’s not true when it comes to our politics and civic life. And maybe more pernicious is the fact that people just aren’t involved. They get cynical. And they give up. And as a consequence, we have one of the lowest voting rates of any advanced democracy and low participation rates then translate into a further gap between who’s governing us and what we believe.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/04/24/watch-obama-prompts-laughter-from-audience-in-first-public-remarks-since-leaving-office/

Racist Obama Caused Dems' Downfall, Not Hillary!

T he press is starting to pile on Hillary Clinton for losing to President Trump, but the real cause of the Democrats' defeat i...